Cases 81 - 90 of 191
Reeves et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01436
Plaintiff:
Karen Reeves , Retha Clememts , Shereel Connolly and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nankervis v. Goebel et al
as 2:2017cv11175
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nankervis
Defendant:
Matt Goebel, Paul Kinal, Michael Emmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Byron Smith
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tabak v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2016cv09167
Plaintiff:
Alec Tabak
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hemminger v. New Meadowlands Stadium Company LLC et al
as 1:2016cv06382
Defendant:
Emmis Radio LLC and New Meadowlands Stadium Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Hemminger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hemminger v. New Meadowlands Stadium Company LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06382
Defendant:
Emmis Radio LLC and New Meadowlands Stadium Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Hemminger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Parisienne v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2016cv08302
Plaintiff:
Theodore Parisienne
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Illustrated Properties Real Estate Inc. et al
as 9:2016cv81569
Plaintiff:
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.
Defendant:
Illustrated Properties Real Estate Inc. , Kathleen S. McLane , Emmy Buckman and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
