Cases 81 - 90 of 148
Phillips v. Gamestop, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02173
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Phillips
Defendant:
Gamestop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. Gamestop, Inc.
as 1:2013cv24228
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
Gamestop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gamestop, Inc. v. Loan Ranger Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gamestop, Inc.
Defendant:
Loan Ranger Acquisitions, LLC , The Bill Edwards Group, LLC and The Bill Edwards Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Gullap v. Gamestop, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01741
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gullap and Andy Tavarez
Defendant:
Gamestop, Inc., Gary Nadler, Jr. and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MacroSolve, Inc. v. GameStop Corp. et al
as 6:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
MacroSolve, Inc.
Defendant:
GameStop Corp. and GameStop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Guerriere v. Gamestop, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05015
Defendant:
Gamestop of New York, Inc. and Gamestop, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guerriere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
FARLEY v. GAMESTOP CORP. et al
as 1:2012cv04734
Plaintiff:
JOHN FARLEY
Defendant:
GAMESTOP CORP. , GAMESTOP.COM, INC. , B&N GAMESTOP HOLDING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
