Cases 81 - 90 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv00844
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, Royal Jones and Progressive American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jim Hitchens, Frank Johnson and Thomas Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HITCHENS v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2011cv07233
Petitioner:
SYLVIO HITCHENS
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HITCHENS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59606
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T HITCHENS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Saintvil v. Infuscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv22202
Plaintiff:
Cidone Saintvil
Defendant:
Infuscience, Inc. and Karen Hitchen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hitchens v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv11224
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hitchens
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. AMERICAN INTERCONTINENTAL UNIVERSITY, INC. et al
as 1:2011mc00182
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MELISSA SIMMS POWELL, ANGELA HITCHENS and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN INTERCONTINENTAL UNIVERSITY, INC. , UNIVERSTIY, INC., CAREER EDUCATION CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
