Cases 81 - 90 of 867
Thomas Wilson v. Perkinson et al
as 3:2021cv03069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Daryl Wilson
Defendant:
Perkinson, Corporal Kelly, Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wilson v. Perkinson et al
as 4:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Daryl Wilson
Defendant:
Perkinson, Kelly, Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritch v. Karas
as 5:2021cv05156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fritch
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Karas and Nurse Kelly Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00768
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dexter Payne, R Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornsberry v. Kelly et al
as 2:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Thornsberry
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, Terrance D Daniels and William F Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sitton et al v. Bentonville School District et al
as 5:2021cv05146
Plaintiff:
Matt Sitton, Matthew Bennett and Elizabeth Bennett
Defendant:
Bentonville School District, Dr. Debbie Jones, Eric White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
