Cases 81 - 90 of 93
ROBINSON v. MCNAMARA et al
as 1:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
DENNIS MCNAMARA, BARRY ANECHIARICO and JIM MOSES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. LEE, CORBETT ROAD
as 1:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
LEE, CORBETT ROAD
Claimant:
DANIEL G LITTLEFIELD
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHOATE v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CHOATE
Defendant:
BOBBY LEE BEARD
Cross_defendant:
BOBBY LEE BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY v. DAIGLE et al
as 2:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LEE LAVIGNE
Counter_claimant:
LEE LAVIGNE
Counter_defendant:
PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
CHANCEY et al v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
RHONDA CHANCEY and ALLAN COOMBS
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CHRYSLER LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
CINDY LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RICHES v. FANFAN et al
as 2:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
DUNCAN FANFAN, FREDDIE J BOOKER, RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
