Cases 81 - 90 of 471
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benzing v. USAA Officer Severance Plan
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Lisa Benzing
Defendant:
USAA Officer Severance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tolbert v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shantal Tolbert
Defendant:
Willye Mai King, Richelieu Dennis, Yende Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Massey v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03111
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Lisa Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
LISA HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Butt et al v. Jaddou et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Usman Butt and Sophia Butt
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, AAD Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BIGGS v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
LISA BIGGS
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Clark v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Clark
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WATSON v. HARMON et al
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
LISA HARMON, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
