Cases 81 - 90 of 459
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RUIZ v. Royal Miss Belmar, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv17165
Plaintiff:
NELSON RUIZ
Defendant:
Royal Miss Belmar, LLC, Miss Belmar Royal, LLC, SS Miss Belmar, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Shikeb Saddozai v. A. Carwithen, et al
as 21-16284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
M. B. ATCHLEY, Warden, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CONTROL TOWER OFFICER and others
B. v. Roosevelt Inn LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02984
Defendant:
Roosevelt Inn LLC, ALPHA-CENTURION SECURITY, INC., ROOSEVELT MOTOR INN, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
DAIQUAN DAVIS and ABDUL LOPEZ
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
M.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2021cv06118
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
B. et al v. Medica Insurance
as 2:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
T. B. and M. B.
Defendant:
Medica Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
B. et al v. Evergreen Health et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
M. B., Kim B. and John B.
Defendant:
Select Plus Plan and Evergreen Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35371
Plaintiff:
OMTEME M B SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
