Cases 81 - 90 of 252
Tri Q. On v. Robert Houston
as 12-2519
Petitioner - Appellant:
Tri Q. On
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Orona et al v. Alaniz-Fernandez et al
as 3:2012cv00238
Defendant:
Rodrigo Alaniz-Fernandez, Julio Contreras, Robert Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Orona, Monica Orona and Raquel Orona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Saylor v. State of Nebraska, et al.
as 4:2012cv03115
Defendant:
Natalie Baker, Dennis Bakewell, Fred Britten and others
Plaintiff:
James Saylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert Campbell v. Robert Houston
as 12-2251
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Manning v. Houston
as 4:2012cv03102
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Aaron D. Manning
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunkin v. Houston
as 4:2012cv03086
Petitioner:
Robert J. Dunkin
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthies v. Houston
as 4:2012cv03069
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Gregory M. Matthies
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steve Davis v. Robert Houston
as 12-1699
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steve L. Davis
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston
Hansen v. Houston
as 4:2012cv03048
Petitioner:
Jerry Hansen
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Segura v. Houston
as 8:2012cv00060
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eddy Segura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
