Cases 81 - 90 of 134
RODGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07525
Plaintiff:
DENYELL MARSHEE RODGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANTE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv05952
Plaintiff:
RODGERS DANTE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOTSON et al v. TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF et al
as 3:2016cv05233
Plaintiff:
JAMAL A. DOTSON, THOMAS F. KENNEDY, ALEX R. LOSCALZO and others
Defendant:
TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF, ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER'S STAFF, S. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODGERS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05118
Plaintiff:
SHERRICKER RODGERS
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , BAYER PHARMA AG and BAYER OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODGERS v. CSMI, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02746
Plaintiff:
SHARON RODGERS
Defendant:
CSMI, LLC and CAMDEN COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROMAN v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2016cv01110
Plaintiff:
ADRIANO ROMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 3:2016cv00695
Plaintiff:
LINDA RODGERS , Donna Armstrong , Debra Blackwood and others
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. CITY OF RAHWAY et al
as 2:2015cv08880
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEWIS
Defendant:
CITY OF RAHWAY, RAHWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN RODGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHAEL v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2015cv08461
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY A. SCHAEL
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD, WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID WAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
