Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Christians v. Christensen et al
as 4:2022cv04072
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Christians
Defendant:
Nancy Christensen, Laurie Stratman, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Valued Pharmacy Services of the Midwest v. Avera Health Plans, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04032
Plaintiff:
Valued Pharmacy Services of the Midwest doing business as NFP RX Solutions
Defendant:
Avera Health Plans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nygaard v. Skywest Airlines et al
as 5:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Michael Nygaard
Defendant:
Skywest AIrlines, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Chubb Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Beall v. Keuter et al
as 4:2021cv04181
Plaintiff:
Catherine Beall
Defendant:
Michael John Keuter and Mike's Line Boring Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Black Hills Clean Water Alliance v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 5:2021cv05072
Plaintiff:
Black Hills Clean Water Alliance
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
