Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 81 - 90 of 897
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv02370
Plaintiff: TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP SR
Defendant: COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON, SR v. SCHAEFFER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00570
Plaintiff: RICKIE L. JOHNSON, SR
Defendant: S. SCHAEFFER and MARSHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00567
Petitioner: MICHAEL COLLINS, SR.
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Custer v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00446
Plaintiff: Justin N Custer, Sr
Defendant: DeKalb County Jail, Mark, Joshua Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. COFFEE et al
as 2:2022cv00537
Plaintiff: ANDREW ALLEN, SR.
Defendant: COFFEE and GIRDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. USA
as 1:2022cv02202
Petitioner: MATTHEW LEVI COLE, SR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TAYLOR v. AUTOZONE INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff: EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant: AUTOZONE INC. and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Malcolm
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff: Dontae M Smith, Sr.
Defendant: Malcolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06907
Plaintiff: JAMES G. TANNER, SR.
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COBB v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv02037
Plaintiff: MARSHALL SR COBB
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?