Cases 81 - 90 of 75,090
Steven Michaud v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv04950
Plaintiff:
Steven Michaud
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rose et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01487
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Unknown Fannin, Shaun McKenzie, Ricky Bear and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill et al v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Tameca Hill
Defendant:
Brian Young, Richard Tolentino, Alexander Verreault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rose et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01480
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose and The Estate of Oliver Rose
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonilla
as 4:2024cv03506
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
