Cases 81 - 90 of 205
Yeager v. Fondren et al
as 2:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
Robert Terrell Yeager
Defendant:
Fondren, Bedsole, Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackey v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Bakari Mackey
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Unknown African-American Female Seargeant, Mike Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCADO v. SHELBY COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv03350
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY and SHELBY COUNTY JAIL DEPUTIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeager v. Fondren et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00585
Plaintiff:
Robert Terrell Yeager
Defendant:
Capt. Fondren, Lt. Bedsole, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv02470
Plaintiff:
Donald Douglas
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Bill Oldham and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv01004
Plaintiff:
Donald Douglas
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Bill Oldham and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Quality Corrections Health Care, Officer K Boird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00457
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Powell
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, John Samaniego, Quality Corrections Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledbetter v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kenndrick Ledbetter
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Newton, Bratcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv03017
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Burns
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Dodson, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
