Cases 81 - 90 of 123
Vargas v. St. Vincent Medical Center et al
as 1:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Ray Vargas and Maria Quintana-Jacquez
Defendant:
St. Vincent Medical Center
Thirdparty_defendant:
La Familia Medical Center , Kristine Parke and Kurt Kastendieck
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
St. Vincent Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stephens et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Defendant:
Dr. Juile Andrews, John Barker, Rex Burkholder and others
Plaintiff:
Karellen Stephens, Qadira Stephens and Renee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
St. Vincent Hospital v. National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees
as 6:2011cv00776
Plaintiff:
St. Vincent Hospital
Defendant:
National Union of Hospital and HealthCare Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
William Caradine/Assabur, II v. St. Vincent Hospital
as 11-1570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William F. Caradine/Assabur, II
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Vincent Hospital
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
