Cases 81 - 90 of 976
Bouldrey v. Techtronic Industries of North America Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Bouldrey
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries of North America Inc and The Home Depot Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quintanilla v. Home Depot USA, Inc et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Quintanilla
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc and The Home Depot, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richardson et al v. Home Depot Inc.
as 2:2023cv10560
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nekeyua Richardson and Christopher Westphal
Defendant:
Home Depot Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vaishnav v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10532
Plaintiff:
Dhaval Vaishnav
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., The Home Depot, Inc., Pingora Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Swarts v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jason Swarts
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anastasiou v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 3:2023cv10445
Plaintiff:
Michael Anastasiou
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anastasio v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10445
Plaintiff:
Michael Anastasio
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kauffman v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
David Kauffman
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping - Injunctive Relief or Civil Fine
COMPRES-CARRASCO v. HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
FLAVIA COMPRES-CARRASCO
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morgan v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60223
Plaintiff:
Pauline Morgan
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
