Cases 81 - 90 of 504
Sampedro v. JJT Hospitality, LLC d/b/a 526 Main & Tequila Blue et al
as 2:2019cv12919
Defendant:
JJT Hospitality, LLC d/b/a 526 Main & Tequila Blue, DJ Tony Toca 313 and Bachata Nights
Plaintiff:
Claudia Sampedro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Shields et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12882
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Andy Dillon, Michael Prysby and others
Plaintiff:
Lillian Swinton, Lenon Thompson, I. T. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12709
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Daugherty Johnson, Gerald Ambrose and others
Plaintiff:
Randell Kelley, Denise Cooper Sawyers, Rebecca Deacons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ptak v. Social Security
as 2:2019cv12609
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tony F Ptak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv12490
Defendant:
Sergeant Johnson, John Doe Officer 2, John Doe Officer 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeski #829281 v. Trierweiler et al
as 1:2019cv00642
Plaintiff:
David Galeski #829281, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Davids, Tony Trierweiler, Unknown Mote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Live Downtown Grand Rapids, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00624
Defendant:
20 Fulton East II, Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP, 20 Fulton East Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP and Live Downtown Grand Rapids, LLC
Plaintiff:
Toni Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Otworth v. Moulatsiotis et al
as 1:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Samantha Reasner, Dana Nessel, Cheryl Moss and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otworth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Uraz #114653 v. Ingham County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00550
Plaintiff:
Tunc Uraz #114653 and Tony Uraz
Defendant:
Sam Davis, Ingham County Jail, Gene Wriggelsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
