Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-16010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cannon v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 10-7027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL G. WORKMAN and others
Jackson v. Workman et al
as 6:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Shelton D. Jackson
Defendant:
Randall Workman and Tracy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Christy Ponder, Christy Ponder, Christy Ponder and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Knox v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vivian Scott v. Christian Title and Escrow
as 10-1137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIVIAN SCOTT and NELL SCOTT, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TITLE AND ESCROW, INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
TRACY DAVIS, PAUL BARNES, IREIS, LLC and others
Cannon v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jemaine Monteil Cannon
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections, Randall G. Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-17304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Tracey C. Tharp
as 09-1994
Petitioner:
In re: TRACEY C. THARP, a/k/a Yvette Decker, a/k/a Tracie Davis, a/k/a Tracie Moody, a/k/a Tracey Davis Tharp, a/k/a Tracy Davis
:
Knox v. Sockey et al
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
