Cases 81 - 90 of 364
Williams v. Carter et al
as 8:2021cv03491
Plaintiff:
Davonta Williams
Defendant:
Taia Carter, Miles Perkins and Christian Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman et al v. Town of Port Royal et al
as 9:2021cv03337
Plaintiff:
Paul Vernon Coffman, Jr and Stephanie Coffman
Defendant:
Town of Port Royal, Port Royal Police Department, Chief Alan Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Florence County Detention Center
as 8:2021cv02963
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Carter, Jr.
Respondent:
Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Carter
as 9:2021cv02715
Plaintiff:
Darlene Riley
Defendant:
Antwan Marquell Carter
Interested Party:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Smith v. Carter et al
as 0:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Smith
Defendant:
Stacy Carter, Eric Flavor, Audra Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClam v. Valdes Enterprises LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01944
Defendant:
Amanda Carter, Valdes Enterprises LLC and Vickie Peach Hose
Plaintiff:
Zenna McClam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Carter v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
as 1:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
Bobby Carter
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv02258
Plaintiff:
Lillian Romana Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Martin II v. Captain Carter et al
as 0:2021cv01464
Defendant:
Major Smith, Captain Carter, Al Cannon Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Andy David Martin II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
