Cases 31 - 40 of 2,203
Goodwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Amy Goodwin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Vandiver v. Coffelt et al
as 4:2024cv10793
Plaintiff:
Jerry Vandiver
Defendant:
Amy Coffelt and Dunlevy Adrienne
Quintana v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01431
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Quintana
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Amy Marie Eddington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joey Jackson and Amy Jackson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Millard v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Odin Millard
Defendant:
Amy Mitchell doing business as JM Farms, John Mitchell doing business as JM Farms, Joe Mitchell doing business as JM Farms and others
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
