Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Arthur Nathaniel Pruitt, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loving v. Scheinert et al
as 6:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Terry Loving
Defendant:
Arthur Scheinert and Evan Taber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wilds v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Wilds
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Johnson and James Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Ethan Jones, Chase McKeown, Thomas Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Mosley et al
as 6:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jerry Robinson
Defendant:
Jammie Mosley, Laurel County, APRN Chastity King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sydnor v. Todd County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
John Sydnor, Micah Thompson and Louis Taylor
Defendant:
Todd County Jail, Jeff Penick and Arthur Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Penick et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Brown
Defendant:
Jeff Penick and Arthur Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
