Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Anderson v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2019cv05467
Defendant:
N. Walker, Patrick Munyon, Kim M Foxx and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Richard Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURKEY v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, UNITED STATES, J. T. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY I. PURKEY
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN R. MALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, David Childers, Salvador Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt et al v. GAbbot state of Texa Employees et al
as 1:2017cv08967
Plaintiff:
George G. Wyatt, Lisa M. Hill Wyatt, Nell Johnson and others
Defendant:
GAbbot state of Texa Employees, T-D-C-J-I-Wardens, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUSE v. SHEPHERD et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
ABDUWALI ABDUKHADIR MUSE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER McCOY, KIMBERLY RHOADS and R.D. SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Orozco v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Victor Orozco
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Boswell Pharmacy Services, John Coe and others
Respondent:
R.D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orozco v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2016cv07564
Plaintiff:
Victor Orozco
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Boswell Pharmacy Services, John Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Adams et al
as 1:2016cv04565
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cotton
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
R.D. Adams, D.D. Lamon, P.O. Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Maurice Gryp
as 15-3510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE R.D. GRYP
Xie v. Romero et al
as 1:2014cv06082
Plaintiff:
Jun Guang Xie
Defendant:
M. A. Romero, R.D. Forgue, C. E. Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
