Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Potter v. USA
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Vickie Joy Potter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Joseph Gargan v. Vicky Moser
as 23-7106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH E. GARGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
VICKY MOSER, KIM SWINDELL, DONALD EPPLEY and others
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis Terry v. Frank Bishop
as 23-6959
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS DAVON TERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK BISHOP, Warden of North Branch Correctional Institution, VICKI BALLOU-WATTS, Judge, Baltimore County, ANNE MARIE GERRING, Public Defender and others
Gargan v. Moser et al
as 5:2022ct03354
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Gargan
Defendant:
Vicky Moser, Kim Swindell, Donald Eppley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terry v. Frank Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Travis Terry
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Vicki Ballou-Watts, Anne Marie Gerring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Green
as 1:2021cv02529
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Jones
Defendant:
Dionna Green, Dr. Tedla, K. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
