Cases 21 - 30 of 104
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 22-10576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert F. Hallman
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff's Department, Maintenance Department, Officer FNU Gruudy, Jailer and others
Jenkins v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Antwune Ladon Jenkins
Defendant:
Warden Bruce Armstrong, Sgt. FNU Whitaker, Sgt. FNU Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn, The Maintenance Department, Officer FNU Gruundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blane v. Bell County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 5:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Louis Gene Blane, Jr.
Defendant:
Bell County Sheriffs Dept. and Officer FNU Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Gibbs
Defendant:
FNU Jackson, FNU Moton, Jared C Oneal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leek (ID 63523) v. Androski et al
as 5:2021cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Leek
Defendant:
Kathryn A. Androski, (fnu) Jackson, Dan Schnurr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Taylor, et al
as 21-6014
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT FNU HENDERSHOT, SGT. FNU HANSON, LIEUTENANT FNU CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ALEXANDER PARKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
