Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Schlobohm v. Hayden et al
as 5:2022cv03314
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Schlobohm
Defendant:
Calvin Hayden, (fnu) Reed, (fnu) Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Texas Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Public Safety, John West, Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Morris et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Terrell Walker
Defendant:
FNU Morris, FNU Griffin, J. Millier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jarvis Payne
Defendant:
State of Texas, BCADC, Pre-Trial Bond Officer 1 [43820], in and for the State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winningham v. Blount et al
as 3:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant:
Cory Blount, Steve Carpenter, D Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, D.H.O. Carol, Assistant Warden Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
