Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Nevers v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Rhett Covington, Morgan Leblanc, Unknown John Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Nevers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nez et al v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2020cv08146
Defendant:
Unknown Hutchinson, Colton B Hutchinson, Flagstaff, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Marcella Nez and Tremayne Nez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevers v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2019cv00785
Defendant:
Rhett Convington, Ashley Myles, Morgan Leblanc and others
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Nevers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevers v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00693
Defendant:
Ashley Myles, Rhett Covington, Morgan LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Nevers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia #076605 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02933
Plaintiff:
Diego Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Service Incorporated, Glen Babich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Thompson v. Lt. Esham, et al
as 16-3830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. ESHAM, NURSE HART, [UNKNOWN] SEARS and others
Gerald Thompson v. Lt. Esham, et al
as 16-3832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. ESHAM, NURSE HART, [UNKNOWN] SEARS and others
Gerald Thompson v. Lt. Esham, et al
as 16-3505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. ESHAM, NURSE HART, [UNKNOWN] SEARS and others
Carl Jones v. John Prelesnik, et al
as 12-2305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL LEE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, ERICA HUSS, Assistant Warden, N. NORWOOD, Deputy Warden and others
Odom #228931 v. Hines et al
as 2:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Defendant:
Daniel Hines, Jeri Ann Sheri, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
