Cases 31 - 40 of 3,700
Welch v. Contreras
as 9:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Welch
Defendant:
Lilian Amador Contreras
Other:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Contreras v. Baysore et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Martinez Contreras
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore and FCI Yazoo City Medium
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Choudhury et al v. Contreras Transports LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Abdus Choudhury, Rufia Choudhury and Nahim Choudhury
Defendant:
Contreras Transports LLC and Frankel Gerez-Santos
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Ponce
as 24-40187
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marvin Ramon Ramos Ponce, also known as Marvin Ramon Ponce, also known as Eddie Ponce Contreras, also known as Eddie Ponce, also known as Rafael Ramos-Egardeo
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. Contreras
as 24-1709
Defendant:
JESUS CONTRERAS, Seal U and Yuck
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
