Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Dooley v. CMH Homes, LLC
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Brittany Dooley
Defendant:
CMH Homes, LLC doing business as Clayton Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Samuel Whatley v. Richland County Family Court, Columbia, SC
as 23-1449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHLAND COUNTY FAMILY COURT COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA, PHOEBE WHATLEY, MONET S. PINCUS, Family Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1455
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dooley et al v. Jefferson Surgical Clinic, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dooley and Kurt Rice
Defendant:
Jefferson Surgical Clinic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tibbetts v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde-Fenwal Inc, Pharmacia LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David G. Tibbetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kiser v. Carlton et al
as 7:2021cv00455
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darrell Kiser
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Tom Dooley and Dr. Josef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durwin Bonds v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-7146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ROANOKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Bonds v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Allen, Roanoke City Commonwealth Attorney Office, Roanoke City Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Durwin Evant Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
