Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Taylor v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Rahn Taylor
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Evelyn Hudson, Jessica Tippett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2021cv01220
Plaintiff:
Rahn Taylor
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Herb Bernsen, Evelyn Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Toney Manuel, Terrance Dooley, Jr., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rashaud Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2020cv00618
Defendant:
Gerald Snyder, Terrance Dooley, Jr., Travis Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dudley v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Gerald Snyder, Terrance Dooley, Jr., Travis Hewitt and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Rayshun Dudley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2020cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson, Jerry Arnaz Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, James A. Pudlowski, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv02711
Plaintiff:
Doris Stangl, Mable Hudgins, Debra Kubanek and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks v. Rardon et al
as 5:2019cv06085
Defendant:
Baker, K Herring, Ryan Crews and others
Plaintiff:
Sirena Latrese Meeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Hays et al
as 4:2018cv00445
Plaintiff:
Terry Joe Roberts
Defendant:
Dustin Hays, Donna Rick, Michael Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
