Cases 1 - 10 of 36
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. Dooley Roofing, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02869
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
Dooley Roofing, Inc. and Beverly Carrion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
WILLIAMS v. DOOLEY et al
as 2:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
MALIK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
P/O PATRICK DOOLEY, LARRY KRASNER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE 15TH DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOOLEY v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv02663
Plaintiff:
SHANE DOOLEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY MAGISTERIAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 2:2020cv04878
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Lisa Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dooley v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 2:2020cv04873
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Lisa Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02070
Plaintiff:
CALVIN PARKS
Defendant:
WILLIAM POSTOWSKI, JR., THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PATRICK DOOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01310
Plaintiff:
Casey Dooley
Defendant:
Kevin Kauffman, John E. Wetzel and Richard A. Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLEY v. TICE et al
as 2:2017cv04315
Petitioner:
LEREX R. DOOLEY
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _______________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v. YOUNG
as 2:2017mc00014
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DONALD ANTHONY YOUNG
Trustee:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Cause Of Action: Appointment of Receiver
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
