Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tope v. Mountain View Financial LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Trenton N Tope
Defendant:
Mountain View Financial LLC, Erik Enriquez Renova, Yadira Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
Enriquez v. G.D. Barri & Associates Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Enrico Enriquez
Defendant:
G.D. Barri & Associates Incorporated and Alexandria Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez et al v. AG West Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Zeferino Lopez, Jorge Delgado Marias, Juan A Enriquez and others
Defendant:
AG West Logistics LLC and Rudy Mireles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Enriquez v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01451
Petitioner:
Edgar Javier Enriquez
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers et al v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gilbert M Rivera, Gilbert Bejarano, Patrick Coty Chester and others
Defendant:
J Adam Shepherd, Gila, County of, Penni Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevarez v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00243
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, Gila, County of, J Adam Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Cesar Evan Enriquez Nevarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02943
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
