Cases 1 - 10 of 6,571
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Orejudos et al v. AT&T, INC.
as 3:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lee Orejudos and Jean Felix
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ulanch v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1178
Plaintiff:
FELIX URMAN, THE KELLNER NEWCOMER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP and MARK ULANCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Medina v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Felix Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Felix v. Unifin, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Melissa Felix
Defendant:
Unifin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baena Pedreros et al v. Land Shapes Contracting, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
Aymer A. Baena Pedreros and Felix Perla Vasquez
Defendant:
Land Shapes Contracting, Inc. and Chris Sicignano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Felix v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1166
Plaintiff:
YAN CAI JIANG and ALMA FELIX, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
