Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Eve Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 16-1677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVE M. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., BRENDA GREER and JAMES V. HARNEY, JR.
Defendant:
STEPHANIE C. FITZGERALD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv04832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. et al
as 3:2015cv00387
Plaintiff:
Eve M. Davis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. , Brenda Greer , James V. Harney, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv04753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Edward Carrington v. City of Durham
as 11-1465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
STEVEN W. CHALMERS, PATRICK BAKER, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF DURHAM, MARK GOTTLIEB, BENJAMIN HIMAN and others
Edward Carrington v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.