Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Theophilus Tari Agedah et al v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2021cv07975
Plaintiff:
Theophilus Tari Agedah, Kwayee M. Tarty, Adhnanu Fahed Miri and others
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Seven Unknown Doe, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin M. Zapata v. State of California et al
as 8:2021cv01448
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Zapata
Defendant:
State of California, OC County California Jail Deps and Sheiff, Doctors and Nurses at OC County Jail California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rouser v. Covello et al
as 2:2021cv01396
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Rodgers, S. Gyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Heath and Human Services Agency et al
as 3:2021cv01287
Plaintiff:
Jerry Bryant Bowman
Defendant:
Heath and Human Services Agency and Child Welfare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Howell v. Rangel, et al
as 2:2021cv00954
Defendant:
A. Labao, J. Stephenson, M. Juarez and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00615
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC)Howell v. Heath et al
as 2:2021cv00709
Defendant:
Davis, Connie Gibbson, J. Stephenson and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. Uttecht
as 3:2020cv06223
Petitioner:
Brent Allen Heath
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Alarcon v. Webb et al
as 2:2020cv01201
Defendant:
Webb, J. Heath and A. Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Jean Alarcon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Schuster et al
as 3:2020cv08141
Defendant:
Heath Mosby, Gregory McPhillips, Doug Schuster and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
