Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stock v. Grundy County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Alexander Raymond Stock
Defendant:
Grundy County, Tennessee, Grundy County Sheriffs Department, Heath Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gregg v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Heath L. Gregg
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Aldridge et al v. Regions Bank
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Everett Mills, Rick Eldridge, Louis Frank Knight and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Yishra'el v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Plaintiff:
Omar Qolayah Yishra'el
Defendant:
C Mullinix, Eric Diaz, Burlon Hayworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Thompson v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (RLJ2)
as 3:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Thompson , Andre Moorer and Christie Heath
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDonald v. Sessions et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Anton D McDonald
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Ian Heath Gershengorn, The 114th Congress of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustin v. Gobble et al
as 1:2017mc00003
Petitioner:
Abraham A Augustin
Respondent:
Tim Gobble, Heath Arthur, Carl Maskew and others
Augustin v. Gobble et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Petitioner:
Abraham A Augustin
Respondent:
Tim Gobble , Heath Arthur, Carl Maskew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
