Cases 1 - 10 of 907
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gregory v White County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Isaac William Gregory
Defendant:
White County Superior Court, Brad Wooley, Laura Cosgray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREGORY v. WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
ISAAC WILLIAM GREGORY
Defendant:
WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, BRAD WOOLEY, LAURA COSGRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duran et al v. Anaya et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Marie Duran and Isaac Granado
Defendant:
Xavier Anaya, Christopher Rider and The City of Artesia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bounphakhom v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv21132
Plaintiff:
Phonepasong Bounphakhom
Defendant:
Lieutenant Gerneral Jody J. Daniels, Major General Jeffrey W. Jurasek, Major General Kris A. Belanger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Peterson v. Obert et al.
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Magistrate Lisa Obert, Bailiff Jim, Priest Dominic Coletta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
