Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferies v. J.R. Leonard Construction Co.
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Demeturis Jefferies
Defendant:
J.R. Leonard Construction Co.
Acker v. North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02124
Petitioner:
Jeffery Ray Acker
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rager v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Rager
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WADDELL et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Aaron Waddell, Abreka Regues, Albert Sidney Palmer and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SCOTLAND COUNTY v. WARNER
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
SCOTLAND COUNTY
Defendant:
JEFFERY DAVID WARNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Price v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Price
Defendant:
Act. Comm. SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
WARNER v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY DAVID WARNER
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jeffery White
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
