Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Morales et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02544
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johnny P. Morales and Marisela Ochoa Arriada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez-Ochoa #106061 v. Rewerts
as 1:2019cv00008
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Lopez-Ochoa #106061
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres-Ochoa v. Serrott et al
as 2:2018cv00965
Defendant:
Mark A. Serrott, Jay G. Perez and David W. Inshey
Plaintiff:
Loreto Torres-Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa v. Bard et al
as 2:2018cv00892
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar Lopez et al v. Shoreline Growers, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Armando Aguilar Lopez , Christian Alcala , Ann Marie Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Shoreline Growers, Inc., Brookside Farms, LLC, Richard Brolick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Electrical Workers' Insurance Fund v. Daniel Ochoa
as 2:2017cv13796
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers' Insurance Fund
Defendant:
Daniel Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Crawford v. Bolton et al
as 3:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
Jamal Rashad Crawford
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Vincent, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Government, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Mark Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGriff et al v. Ochoa et al
as 3:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Mark McGriff , Doug Robinson , Greg Hauswald and others
Defendant:
Suzanne Ochoa and Solis Stone of Kentucky LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Agnni Ochoa Turcios v. Jeff Session
as 17-3228
Petitioner:
AGNNI ELENA OCHOA TURCIOS
Respondent:
JEFF B. SESSIONS, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
