Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Davison v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Davison
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Cielo Rodriguez, Mallory Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross-Blancke v. Flaiz et al
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cross-Blancke
Defendant:
James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray and Oscar E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Robles v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez-Robles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cromartie v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Alton Cromartie
Defendant:
Dr. Arthur Hale, Mary Roush, Ashley Orsbone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedeno v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Stuart A Friedman, Ronnie Ducoff, Timothy J. McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez Morant v. Moyer et al
as 2:2021cv05211
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Rodriguez Morant
Defendant:
Vanessa Moyer, Cornell L. Birden, John Glen Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnpillai v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
Jessie Johnpillai
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Harold May, Charlotte Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv01998
Petitioner:
Marlon Magdiel Lopez Rodriguez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S.A General, I.C.E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Fender
as 1:2021cv01363
Petitioner:
Randy V. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Foley
as 1:2021cv00703
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
