Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Saetern v. McLane/Suneast, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01000
Defendant:
McLane Beverage Distribution, Inc., McLane/Western, Inc., McLane Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chan Saetern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Saetern v. McLane/Suneast, Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00666
Plaintiff:
Chan Saetern
Defendant:
McLane/Western, Inc., McLane Interstate Warehouse, Inc., Jose Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024at00317
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Estate of Tomi Kartchner et al v. County of Merced et al
as 1:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Estate of Tomi Kartchner, S. B., Kerry Calvert and others
Defendant:
County of Merced, Merced County Sheriff's Office, Vernon Warnke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Chiu v. Saechou et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Taifusin Chiu and Chiew Lio Saetern
Defendant:
Farm Fow Saechou and President of the U.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
(PC) Thomas v. Ali et al
as 2:2020cv00864
Defendant:
J. Munoz, D. Yang, C. Ajah and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Latrell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenkner et al v. County of Tehama
as 2:2017cv01839
Plaintiff:
Robert Lenkner , Matt Jacuzzi , Fred Bickert and others
Defendant:
County of Tehama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
