Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Watson v. Newman, et al.
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donna H. Watson
Defendant:
Richard Keith Newman, Lieutenant Jacquita Rachelle Allen, John F. Keohane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. Appomattox County School Board et al
as 6:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michele Blair
Defendant:
Appomattox County School Board, Dr. Annette A. Bennett, Dena Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. USA
as 2:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Avery Angelo Palmer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hendrick v. Stryker Corp. et al
as 7:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Carrie Rayette Hendrick
Defendant:
Stryker, Corp., Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Stryker Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Woodhouse and Terri Lynne Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Racheal Cunningham, Fredrick Mcpherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Avery v. USA
as 3:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Avery
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gilmore v. Warden et al
as 7:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, D. Hamilton, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Tyganda Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Warden et al
as 1:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, D. Hamilton, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Tyganda Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Call et al
as 3:2020cv00937
Defendant:
W. Jarrett, David Call and S. Gilbertson
Plaintiff:
Avery F. Gray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
