Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 425
Cage-Johnson v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00976
Defendant: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Lashonda Cage-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12047
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marvin Deshawn Cage v. Jason Schultz
as 2:2024cv09955
Respondent: Jason Schultz
Petitioner: Marvin Deshawn Cage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Kraco Enterprises et al
as 2:2024cv09406
Defendant: Armstrong Garden Centers, Krakow Poland, Kraco Enterprises and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10704
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cage et al v. Salah et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Defendant: Falls Lake National Insurance Company, Abdalo Salah and Inbound US Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff: Armand Cage and Jasmine O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Type: Contract Insurance
Lottie v. Cage et al
as 3:2024cv02185
Defendant: John Johnson, Warden Williams and Sgt. Cage
Plaintiff: Jeffery Lottie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. Nixon et al
as 3:2024cv01082
Defendant: William J. Haynes and John T. Nixon
Plaintiff: Quinton Cage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandifer et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff: Kadarious Sandifer and Destynii Cage
Defendant: Cleveland Nelson and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
In re: Quinton Cage
as 24-5787
Petitioner: In re: QUINTON A. CAGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?