Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Lottie v. Cage et al
as 3:2024cv02185
Defendant:
. Williams, John Johnson and . Cage
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lottie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. Nixon et al
as 3:2024cv01082
Defendant:
William J. Haynes and John T. Nixon
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandifer et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Kadarious Sandifer and Destynii Cage
Defendant:
Cleveland Nelson and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lottie v. Cage et al
as 3:2024cv03217
Defendant:
. Williams, . Cage and John Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lottie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richter v. Hatfield, et al
as 24-5084
Defendant:
ROBIN HATFIELD, JESSICA PITTS, AARIKA HOLT and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN D. RICHTER, Administrator of the Estate of Xander Cage Harris-Bruntmyer
Burton v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv01175
Defendant:
Christopher Brownwell, Wendy Nicholas, Linda Chismar and others
Plaintiff:
Niara Safiya Garcia Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Danica Roem et al
as 2:2024cv04886
Defendant:
K-Swiss, Inc., Regal Dickson City, Metropolitan City of Rome Capital and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cage v. SDS Petroleum Consultants, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Defendant:
Nova Mud, Inc. and SDS Petroleum Consultants, LLC
Plaintiff:
Harrell Cage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cage v. Kipp Academy Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03966
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY CAGE
Defendant:
KIPP ACADEMY CHICAGO and DONNELL MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
