Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAWSON v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
MARK THOMAS DAWSON
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY, LAURA A. BODKIN, MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magana v. Dawson
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Maria Magana
Defendant:
Derek J Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dawson v. Olmstead
as 3:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
Lance Patrick Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Russell Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Key, Peggy Katona, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAWSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06837
Plaintiff:
LEROY DAWSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Danny Dawson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Garner v. McDermott et al
as 2:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas McDermott, Lia Dawson, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWSON v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2021cv02721
Plaintiff:
JULIA DAWSON
Defendant:
VICTOR HERNANDEZ and ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
