Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Morgan v. Edens et al
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Juhnell Morgan
Defendant:
. Edens, . Burle, Donald Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Ricky Whitehead
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, I. Doolin, . Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Wurster et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
James E Fuller
Defendant:
. Wurster, Tessa Derby, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Joshua Doolin
as 23-3133
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua Christopher Doolin
United States v. Tony Doolin
as 23-2421
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tony Doolin
DOOLIN v. PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
ERIN DOOLIN
Defendant:
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Nurse et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Donald Doolin, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kate Louise Powell v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Kate Louise Powell
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, nanyangshenqimaoyiyouxiangongsi., Mislojade Official Store and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Haywood v. Tippet et al
as 1:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Tyler Tippet, . McGinnis, . Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
