Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clark v. Howe et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brodie Lee Doyle Clark
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo, Iowa, Brandon Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Wadley et al v. University of Iowa et al
as 4:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Akrum Wadley, Kevonte Martin-Manley, Andre Harris and others
Defendant:
Gary Barta, Board of Regents of The State of Iowa, Christopher Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson et al v. Floyd County, Iowa et al
as 6:2020cv02029
Defendant:
Jim Petrie, Floyd County, Iowa, Chad Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Jeannine Tamayo and Stephen Mark Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Watchendorf
as 4:2019cv00077
Respondent:
Patty Watchendorf
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Tyrone Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doyle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wynee Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv03040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dean Doyle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423
United States of America v. Palmer et al
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Doyle Palmer and LTR Auto, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cohrs v. Emmet County, Iowa, et al
as 3:2016cv03003
Plaintiff:
Therese Marie Cohrs
Defendant:
Emmet County, Iowa, Doyle Becker, Pablo Leal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doyle-Davis et al v. Tamminga et al
as 4:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Carrie Doyle-Davis and Jason Davis
Defendant:
Jordan D. Tamminga and Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer v. McKinley et al
as 6:2015cv02042
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
Bryan McKinley , James Drew , Christopher Foy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
