Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wagner v. ARP Tango Land LLC et al
as 6:2026cv02578
Defendant:
ARP Tango Land LLC and Tu Tu Good LLC doing business as Cafe Tu Tu Tango
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
National Leather Goods Co Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv04979
Defendant:
Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States
Plaintiff:
National Leather Goods Co Inc.
MINDEL HOLDINGS, LLC v. PROVCO GOOD MCB BYBERRY, L.P.
as 2:2026cv08371
Defendant:
PROVCO GOOD MCB BYBERRY, L.P.
Plaintiff:
MINDEL HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Washington v. Randa Accessories Leather Goods, LLC
as 1:2026cv09601
Defendant:
Randa Accessories Leather Goods, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Steiner v. Randa Accessories Leather Goods LLC
as 1:2026cv09594
Defendant:
Randa Accessories Leather Goods LLC
Plaintiff:
Paul Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tn Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
MAYO v. GOODE et al
as 3:2026cv14169
Defendant:
FISHLINE, INC. and JAMOR GOODE
Plaintiff:
NICHET MAYO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Myers v. Provost et al
as 3:2026cv03377
Defendant:
Danessa Armstrong, John Doe, . Cerutti and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv50519
:
Service List
Defendant:
Officer Dider, Officer Good and Officer Smith
Plaintiff:
Jamal Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Good Better Best, Inc. v. United States
as 1:2026cv04748
Plaintiff:
Good Better Best, Inc.
Defendant:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
