Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Beck et al v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2023cv08006
Petitioner:
Leonard Gary Beck and Aspen Henson
Respondent:
David Rhodes and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02409
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Christopher James Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henson v. Corizon Health LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04396
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, Adam Perkins, Dorothy Igwe and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Nevitt v. Remanski et al
as 3:2018cv08239
Defendant:
Justin Sturgill, John McFarland, Joshua Henson and others
Plaintiff:
Aveyon Lashawan Nevitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02985
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Henson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mishenko v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02329
Plaintiff:
Francisco Antonio Mishenko, III
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, Mesa Fire Department, Scottsdale Osborne Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01935
Plaintiff:
Sandra Henson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Henson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henson et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Tanya Henson and Thomas Henson
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, Jim Thompson, Unknown Glass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
