Cases 1 - 10 of 6,699
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 24-50333
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jeffreys v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01184
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kirk Jeffreys and Mary Jeffreys
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
H0WARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner:
KIRK H0WARD
Respondent:
JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hooper v. County of San Diego, et al.
as 24-2709
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HOOPER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM B. KOLENDER, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities and others
D'Angelo v. Filicetti et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Carlo Robert D'Angelo
Defendant:
Michael Filicetti and Mehmet Kirk Okay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields
as 24-5408
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
CHIEF JAILOR KIRK FIELDS, and Subordinates
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields, et al
as 24-5400
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
CHIEF JAILER KIRK FIELDS, and Subordinates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
