Cases 41 - 50 of 28,045
Lin v. Chojnacki et al
as 1:2024cv03725
Plaintiff:
Ger-Lih Lin
Defendant:
Marcin Chojnacki, Laurena Mikosz, Kendall Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Castro Law, LLC v. JGW Debt Settlement, LLC
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Castro Law, LLC
Defendant:
JGW Debt Settlement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Paradise Law LLC v. PLG Partners LLC
as 2:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Paradise Law LLC
Defendant:
PLG Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tryon v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Monee Tryon
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Paxton et al
as 4:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Travis Alford
Defendant:
Ken Paxton and Texas Board of Law Examiners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
