Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Daniel Phoenix v. Alvin Harris
as 26-6469
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX
Defendant:
M.D ALVIN HARRIS, Licensed Medical Practitioner, DR. FRIEND, Licensed Medical Practitioner, DR. K. SHARMA and others
Daniel Phoenix v. J. Schnur
as 26-6451
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
RN J. SCHNUR, Health Authority, DCC, DOCTOR HENCEROTH, Onsite Orthopedic Specialist, NP. MARRANO and others
Daniel Phoenix v. Mark Amonette
as 26-6452
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX
Defendant:
DR. MARK AMONETTE, STEVE HERRICK, DR. ALVIN HARRIS and others
Daniel Phoenix v. Alvin Harris
as 26-6311
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX
Defendant:
DR. ALVIN HARRIS, Licensed Medical Practitioner, DR. FRIEND, Licensed Medical Practitioner, DR. K. SHARMA and others
James Wood v. Chadwick Dotson
as 25-6933
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. WOOD
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the VADOC, DR. PAUL TARGONSKI, Chief Medical Director, VADOC, MR. DILLON, MD, Health Services Director, VADOC and others
Muhsen v. City of Lackawanna et al
as 1:2025cv00938
Plaintiff:
Mana Muhsen
Defendant:
City of Lackawanna, Annette Iafallo, Grace Marrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daniel Phoenix v. Alvin Harris
as 25-6139
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX
Defendant:
DR. ALVIN HARRIS, Licensed Medical Practitioner, DR. FRIEND, Licensed Medical Practitioner, DR. K. SHARMA and others
Phoenix v. Dotson, et al
as 3:2024cv00625
Defendant:
David Robinson, Dana Watson, Darrell Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
