Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Jeff Thompson McNabb v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2023cv10515
Plaintiff:
Jeff Thompson McNabb
Defendant:
Kiajakzi and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richard Shreves v. David Harris, et al
as 23-35154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER, MARISA BOSTWICK and others
Hood et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023at00101
Plaintiff:
Susan Hood and Chester McNabb
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Hood et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Susan Hood and Chester McNabb
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Donald E McNabb Company
as 2:2022cv01444
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Donald E McNabb Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
(SS) McNabb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Aaron James McNabb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Richard Shreves v. USDC-MHE
as 21-71407
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RICHARD E. SHREVES, DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Devora-McNabb v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2021cv00880
Plaintiff:
Michele Devora-McNabb
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
